Subscribe in a reader

ISSAQUAH LAW GROUP

Issaquah Law Group: Experienced Counsel; Client Focus

PHILOSOPHY: Formed in 2014, Issaquah Law Group is a law firm with one focus: providing businesses and insurers with high quality legal representation with the responsiveness of a smaller firm. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built upon clear and consistent communication. 

LITIGATION: We work closely with our clients to fully and accurately understand their goals, work collaboratively to formulate specific legal strategies, and execute the agreed plan of action utilizing methods most likely to result in the efficient and effective resolution of the matter. ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals in the areas of personal injury and wrongful death, product liability, commercial general liability, labor & employment, construction litigation, and catastrophic losses due to fire and explosion.

BUSINESS LAW: Rarely is the path from point A to point B a straight line, so our role in a business law practice is to find alternatives, devise workable strategies, and keep your business ideas, goals and objectives moving toward realization. ILG’s business attorneys help clients achieve their goals with respect to business formation, intellectual property, labor and employment, CAN-SPAM, copyright and trademark

COMMUNITY: In addition, the Lawyers at Issaquah Law Group remain active in the legal and civic community. A core commitment of our Issaquah Attorneys is community service. Our attorneys' civic involvement includes the King County Civil Rights Commission; the City of Issaquah Planning Policy Commission; the Northwest Screenwriters Guild, service as a pro tem judge. We live and work in the Pacific Northwest, and we aim to make it a better place.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

Division II: Gun Club Keeps Non-Conforming Use, but Must Abate Nuisance by Expansion

Kitsap County v. Kitsap Rifle & Revolver Club

This is a land use case, and those of you who follow my blog know how I feel about that. Therefore, I will just leave you with the intro, which should clear up how this goes:

We hold that ( 1) the Club' s commercial use of the property and dramatically increased noise levels since 1993, but not the club' s change in its operating hours, constituted an impermissible expansion of its nonconforming use; ( 2) the Club' s development work unlawfully violated various County land use permitting requirements; ( 3) the excessive noise, unsafe conditions, and unpermitted development work constituted a public nuisance; ( 4) the language in the property' s deed of sale from the County to the Club did not preclude the County from challenging the Club' s expansion of use, permit violations, and nuisance activities; and ( 5) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in entering an injunction restricting the use of certain firearms at the shooting range and limiting the Club' s operating hours to abate the public nuisance. We affirm the trial court on these issues except for the trial court' s ruling that the Club' s change in operating hours constituted an impermissible expansion of its nonconforming use. We reverse on that issue.

However, we reverse the trial court' s ruling that terminating the Club' s nonconforming use status as a shooting range is a proper remedy for the Club' s conduct. Instead, we hold that the appropriate remedy involves specifically addressing the impermissible expansion of the Club' s nonconforming use and unpermitted development activities while allowing the Club to operate as a shooting range. Accordingly, we vacate the injunction precluding the Club' s use of the property as a shooting range and remand for the trial court to fashion an appropriate remedy for the Club' s unlawful expansion of its nonconforming use and for the permitting violations.

Also, land use attorneys are nerds!

Subscribe in a reader