Subscribe in a reader

ISSAQUAH LAW GROUP

Issaquah Law Group: Experienced Counsel; Client Focus

PHILOSOPHY: Formed in 2014, Issaquah Law Group is a law firm with one focus: providing businesses and insurers with high quality legal representation with the responsiveness of a smaller firm. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built upon clear and consistent communication. 

LITIGATION: We work closely with our clients to fully and accurately understand their goals, work collaboratively to formulate specific legal strategies, and execute the agreed plan of action utilizing methods most likely to result in the efficient and effective resolution of the matter. ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals in the areas of personal injury and wrongful death, product liability, commercial general liability, labor & employment, construction litigation, and catastrophic losses due to fire and explosion.

BUSINESS LAW: Rarely is the path from point A to point B a straight line, so our role in a business law practice is to find alternatives, devise workable strategies, and keep your business ideas, goals and objectives moving toward realization. ILG’s business attorneys help clients achieve their goals with respect to business formation, intellectual property, labor and employment, CAN-SPAM, copyright and trademark

COMMUNITY: In addition, the Lawyers at Issaquah Law Group remain active in the legal and civic community. A core commitment of our Issaquah Attorneys is community service. Our attorneys' civic involvement includes the King County Civil Rights Commission; the City of Issaquah Planning Policy Commission; the Northwest Screenwriters Guild, service as a pro tem judge. We live and work in the Pacific Northwest, and we aim to make it a better place.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

Washington Legal Roundup – Division I

Mp Medical, Inc. v. Wegman

MP Medical is a California corporation that sells, delivers and repairs medical equipment.  They had an employee in the State of Washington, Philip Wegman, that handled their customers in Washington.  Things went south and Mr. Wegman left MP Medical’s employ.  He started his own business and MP Medical sued him for breach of his nonsolicitation contract and tortious interference with contractual relationship.  The contract was governed by California law, which made the nonsolicitation clause unenforceable. 

The trial court determined that Mr. Wegman was entitled to over $100,000 in attorney fees and costs.  MP Medical appealed.  Mr. Wegman then attempted to enforce the judgment through a writ of execution on the appeal.  The trial court denied a motion by MP Medical to put aside the allegedly wrongful seizure of its appeal by writ of execution.

The Court of Appeals determined that the trial court should have exercised its inherent authority to prevent one side from gaining control over both sides of the litigation, but otherwise affirmed the judgment that the nonsolicitation clause violated California law.

Subscribe in a reader