Subscribe in a reader


Issaquah Law Group: Experienced Counsel; Client Focus

PHILOSOPHY: Formed in 2014, Issaquah Law Group is a law firm with one focus: providing businesses and insurers with high quality legal representation with the responsiveness of a smaller firm. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built upon clear and consistent communication. 

LITIGATION: We work closely with our clients to fully and accurately understand their goals, work collaboratively to formulate specific legal strategies, and execute the agreed plan of action utilizing methods most likely to result in the efficient and effective resolution of the matter. ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals in the areas of personal injury and wrongful death, product liability, commercial general liability, labor & employment, construction litigation, and catastrophic losses due to fire and explosion.

BUSINESS LAW: Rarely is the path from point A to point B a straight line, so our role in a business law practice is to find alternatives, devise workable strategies, and keep your business ideas, goals and objectives moving toward realization. ILG’s business attorneys help clients achieve their goals with respect to business formation, intellectual property, labor and employment, CAN-SPAM, copyright and trademark

COMMUNITY: In addition, the Lawyers at Issaquah Law Group remain active in the legal and civic community. A core commitment of our Issaquah Attorneys is community service. Our attorneys' civic involvement includes the King County Civil Rights Commission; the City of Issaquah Planning Policy Commission; the Northwest Screenwriters Guild, service as a pro tem judge. We live and work in the Pacific Northwest, and we aim to make it a better place.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

WA Supreme Court: WSU's Revised Water Use A-OK

Cornelius v. Washington State Department of Ecology

Its not often that I see the department of ecology sued. But that usually means that someone thinks a particular measure is too strong or too lenient.

So essentially Cornelius et al are claiming that the 2003 amendments to the state’s water law were unconstitutional as applied. Basically, he has a beef as to how he is getting water as compared to WSU. Something can be unconstitutional in several ways, the one we here most often about is unconstitutionally vague. You also here about things like unconstitutional for violations of the XIV Amendment (think racial discrimination, strict scrutiny, and its misapplication in Grutter, Gratz, and P.I.C.S. v. Seattle Public School Dist. No. 1.

Here, its about the application. Cornelius and WSU both draw from the same aquifer. WSU has lots of water rights in the Aquifer, dating back to 1934. Some of the documents for WSU state they are municipal, some state they are domestic. Municipalities have greater protection under the law than they used to under RCW 90.14.140(2)(d). Now, WSU had a lot of wells, consolidated them into two wells, where they now do most of their pumping. After the law changed in 2003, they decided they should probably check in with Department of Ecology to make sure their water rights certificates conformed to their actual use now. The Board of Ecology applied a bunch of different legal doctrines, including water code, abandonment law, State EPA law, and ultimately approved the request from WSU. Cornelius has a problem with that. 

I picture Cornelius as Mr. Scrooge. My guess is he just has a really big farm and hates government spending on anything, so he tries to make them spend more in lawsuits. This is of course, just a guess. I also guess that he looks old and cranky the majority of his day. Again, just a guess. I bet he also shakes sticks at puppies to get off his lawn while complaining about change.

Anyhow, the short answer is everything was fine with the way WSU’s case was handled. There are a slew of issues addressed, but none really worth mentioning here for their legal precedent outside of water law nerds. If you’re a water law guy, you should definitely read this. 

In the meantime, I’m going to pray that I do not get any large clients who need to work with water rights, as it would bore the crap out of me. But, at least I might get to help a crotchety old farmer ;)

The Attorneys at Issaquah Legal Services can help you with all your business needs. Whether its formation, transactions, dealing with State and Local agencies, or litigation, we are here to help. Please contact our Issaquah Lawyers today.

Subscribe in a reader

Copyright 2014-2018 by Issaquah Law Group, PLLC. Powered by Squarespace. Background image by jakeliefer.