Subscribe in a reader


Issaquah Law Group - Injury Litigation Attorneys

TRUST: Personal injuries are personal. Which is why the attorneys at ILG treat every client and every case differently. Because they are different, and extremely personal. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built on trust. Trust that you will be heard. Trust that you will be protected. Trust that every effort will be made to see justice done in your case. The singular goal of every ILG attorney is to earn and preserve that trust.

EXPERIENCE: ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals and we bring this experience to bear on behalf of our clients in personal injury and wrongful death claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents, bus versus pedestrian accidents, defective and dangerous products, medical malpractice, slip/trip and fall accidents, and catastrophic losses due to fire.

LOCATION: We are located on the Eastside in Issaquah, convenient to Bellevue, Redmond, Kirkland, Renton, Sammamish and North Bend. However, we provide legal services in King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County and throughout the entire state of Washington.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

WA Supreme Court: Rapey McRaperson Gets No Full Evidentiary Review Under Sexually Violent Predator Law

In re Personal Restraint of Meirhofer

This is one of those lovely Sexually Violent Predator cases I love so much. Basically, every year these guys get a review. If their condition has changed, usually through treatment, they can get a full review hearing to determine if they can possibly be released. The State either has to present evidence that continued evidence is warranted, or the person restrained can provide evidence that their condition has changed and warrants essentially a new trial on their commitment. 

Essentially, Meirhoffer had gone on a little burglary, rape, and kidnapping spree, including raping two young boys and one young girl, kidnapping one of the boys. Full on cray cray! This is a quote from his 2010 evaluation: “Meirhofer felt entitled to rape teenage boys when he could not find a way to seduce them.” He was also caught making alcohol despite intoxication being one of the factors in his rape. Not getting that impulse control is inhibited by any intoxication, Meirhofer responded, “Quite frankly, I never raped anyone when I was drinking, only when I was under the influence of methamphetamine did I do that.” He was only sad that he got caught for that one, not that he did it.

The confusing part of this case was really a standard that the Supreme Court enunciated, but then withdrew, which created a new standard under which Meirhofer would no longer meet the confinement criteria, but in withdrawing the opinion, he is no longer entitled to full evidentiary review. Its a great read for that. Just know that Merihofer remains confined.

While the lawyers at Issaquah Legal Services do not currently practice criminal law or civil commitment law, we expect to add an Issaquah Attorney practicing in the area soon. In the meantime, please contact us for a referral to other qualified attorneys.

Subscribe in a reader

Copyright 2014-2018 by Issaquah Law Group, PLLC. Powered by Squarespace. Background image by jakeliefer.