Subscribe in a reader


Issaquah Law Group: Experienced Counsel; Client Focus

PHILOSOPHY: Formed in 2014, Issaquah Law Group is a law firm with one focus: providing businesses and insurers with high quality legal representation with the responsiveness of a smaller firm. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built upon clear and consistent communication. 

LITIGATION: We work closely with our clients to fully and accurately understand their goals, work collaboratively to formulate specific legal strategies, and execute the agreed plan of action utilizing methods most likely to result in the efficient and effective resolution of the matter. ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals in the areas of personal injury and wrongful death, product liability, commercial general liability, labor & employment, construction litigation, and catastrophic losses due to fire and explosion.

BUSINESS LAW: Rarely is the path from point A to point B a straight line, so our role in a business law practice is to find alternatives, devise workable strategies, and keep your business ideas, goals and objectives moving toward realization. ILG’s business attorneys help clients achieve their goals with respect to business formation, intellectual property, labor and employment, CAN-SPAM, copyright and trademark

COMMUNITY: In addition, the Lawyers at Issaquah Law Group remain active in the legal and civic community. A core commitment of our Issaquah Attorneys is community service. Our attorneys' civic involvement includes the King County Civil Rights Commission; the City of Issaquah Planning Policy Commission; the Northwest Screenwriters Guild, service as a pro tem judge. We live and work in the Pacific Northwest, and we aim to make it a better place.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

Division III: Parents Keep the Life Estate They Intended, Including Timber. Sons' Hopes Splintered.

Ames v. Ames

For the law students in the room: H and W keep a life estate in Blackacre, conveying the rest to their sons, A and B, their sons. Son C moves onto the property. Parents become estranged from A, B, and daughter D. 

Now, the only valuable asset on the land is timber. Generally, in a life estate, you get the property to use as if it was yours fully, only you can’t waste it. 

Here, they documented this, but in the official conveyance, did not reserve the life estate. The sons, who did not yet own the land under the life estate, negotiated a rental with the other son (C), and interfered with their parents’ management of their own timber and life estate. The son that moved in started manipulating and isolating his parents as well.

Then A and B entered into an agreement with H & W, which “gave” them less rights than they had under the life estate.


Anyhow, the Court granted the life estate to the parents to do what they liked with the property, including timber activities.

Sitting in equity, the trial court sought to give effect to the parties' original intent. Roy and Rubye's continued financial security was a paramount concern. Courts may impose a constructive trust to give effect to the parties' intent. . . . 

The trial court noted that a numerical limit would have prevented Roy and Rubye Ames from effectively managing the forest. The court found that the life estate was intended to allow Roy Ames to harvest timber on the land to the extent he and his wife needed the proceeds. Roy Ames had been frugal in the past decades and the couple had need for increased harvesting. The sons do not challenge these findings.

The court also noted that the doctrine of waste would have allowed the parents to thin the trees for forest health, and that they really intended to keep the entire estate, outside the doctrines of waste. The trial court’s ruling allowing harvesting up to a certain point, and any proper thinning, was fine.

When considering a gift to loved ones, be sure to have it in writing, to spell out the conditions, and to discuss your intentions fully. It prevents situations like this. The Estate and Probate Attorneys at Issaquah Legal Services are more than happy to help with your estate planning and probate needs.

Subscribe in a reader

Copyright 2014-2018 by Issaquah Law Group, PLLC. Powered by Squarespace. Background image by jakeliefer.