Subscribe in a reader

ISSAQUAH LAW GROUP   PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION LAWYERS

Issaquah Law Group - Injury Litigation Attorneys

TRUST: Personal injuries are personal. Which is why the attorneys at ILG treat every client and every case differently. Because they are different, and extremely personal. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built on trust. Trust that you will be heard. Trust that you will be protected. Trust that every effort will be made to see justice done in your case. The singular goal of every ILG attorney is to earn and preserve that trust.

EXPERIENCE: ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals and we bring this experience to bear on behalf of our clients in personal injury and wrongful death claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents, bus versus pedestrian accidents, defective and dangerous products, medical malpractice, slip/trip and fall accidents, and catastrophic losses due to fire.

LOCATION: We are located on the Eastside in Issaquah, convenient to Bellevue, Redmond, Kirkland, Renton, Sammamish and North Bend. However, we provide legal services in King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County and throughout the entire state of Washington.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

Division II: Dismissing Potential Juror Pre-Voir Dire No Reprieve for Murderer

State v. Miller

Miller did very bad things. During his trial for doing said very bad things, a juror was accidentally present during some pretrial issues. The juror was dismissed. Miller sought a new trial, claiming the dismissal of the juror violated his right to be present at critical trial stages and his right to a public trial. However, while voir dire was historically opened the public, dismissing potential jurors before voir dire can began has historically not been a public trial right. For example, court clerks can dismiss jurors before they even get to the courtroom. Bailiffs can dismiss ill jurors before border begins.

Further, it wouldn’t it made a difference. “The fact that the motions were deliberately held outside the prospective jurors’ presence shows that the trial court and the parties believed it would prejudice the jurors to hear the information. For this reason, both Council quickly stipulated the church when he ate should be dismissed. Further, Miller has not made any attempt to explain how juror 28 what have been allowed to remain on his jury under the circumstances."

Subscribe in a reader

Copyright 2014-2018 by Issaquah Law Group, PLLC. Powered by Squarespace. Background image by jakeliefer.