Subscribe in a reader


Issaquah Law Group - Injury Litigation Attorneys

TRUST: Personal injuries are personal. Which is why the attorneys at ILG treat every client and every case differently. Because they are different, and extremely personal. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built on trust. Trust that you will be heard. Trust that you will be protected. Trust that every effort will be made to see justice done in your case. The singular goal of every ILG attorney is to earn and preserve that trust.

EXPERIENCE: ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals and we bring this experience to bear on behalf of our clients in personal injury and wrongful death claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents, bus versus pedestrian accidents, defective and dangerous products, medical malpractice, slip/trip and fall accidents, and catastrophic losses due to fire.

LOCATION: We are located on the Eastside in Issaquah, convenient to Bellevue, Redmond, Kirkland, Renton, Sammamish and North Bend. However, we provide legal services in King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County and throughout the entire state of Washington.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

Division III: Mom's Appearance at Dependency No Good for Default on Termination Petition

In re Welfare of S.I and D.D.

This case is a big one in the world of child dependencies and terminations. There is essentially a two step process for the termination of parental rights. The first one is a dependency action where the child is placed with someone else and the parents are given the opportunity to obtain the services they need and the help they need to become a better parent. Sometimes I does help with drugs, sometimes that is help with how to be a parent, and it could involve a slew of state services, agencies, and third parties, all designed to help the person become a fit parent.

The second part of this is a termination proceeding. The termination proceeding is a little different in that you are saying this person is not going to be a fit parent, and we have done what we can to help them to no avail.

I won’t bore you with the specifics of how this dependency action and termination action came about. What happened was that the mother did appear for the initial dependency action. Needless to say, the services provided to the mother did not help, or we would not be here with this termination proceeding.

A year later, the state filed a termination petition. The mother did not file an appearance in the termination action, and a default was entered which terminated her parental rights.

She argued that because she had appeared in the dependency action that no default could be entered in the termination proceeding. However, the court held that these were separate proceedings, and an appearance in one it does not amount to an appearance in the other.

Now for a bit of commentary from me. It seems to me that having these be two separate proceedings would amount to some confusion for those who are not adept at the legal system. For sure, they are interrelated, and simply receiving a notice that may have a different number, but that you know pertains to the same thing, may not warrant the same alarm to a layperson as it would to an attorney.

Perhaps it is time to modify the system slightly, so that rather than petition for a termination, a termination proceeding simply is done under the same cause number as an extension of the dependency action.


Subscribe in a reader

Copyright 2014-2018 by Issaquah Law Group, PLLC. Powered by Squarespace. Background image by jakeliefer.