Subscribe in a reader

ISSAQUAH LAW GROUP - PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION LAWYERS

Issaquah Law Group - Personal Injury Litigation Attorneys

TRUST: Personal injuries are personal. Which is why the attorneys at ILG treat every client and every case differently. Because they are different, and extremely personal. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built on trust. Trust that you will be heard. Trust that you will be protected. Trust that every effort will be made to see justice done in your case. The singular goal of every ILG attorney is to earn and preserve that trust.

EXPERIENCE: ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals and we bring this experience to bear on behalf of our clients in personal injury and wrongful death claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents, bus versus pedestrian accidents, defective and dangerous products, medical malpractice, slip/trip and fall accidents, and catastrophic losses due to fire.

LOCATION: We are located on the Eastside in Issaquah, convenient to Bellevue, Redmond, Kirkland, Renton, Sammamish and North Bend. However, we provide legal services in King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County and throughout the entire state of Washington.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

Court of Appeals: Div. II - County's exaction necesitates participation in private lawsuit under CR 19

Graziano v. Woodfield Neighborhood Homeowners Assoc. Mr. Graziano bought a lot within the Woodfield Estates Subdivision at a tax foreclosure sale.  The neighborhood association blocked his permit application on the grounds that his lot is restricted to recreational and park use.  He sued and lost on summary judgment.  The court of appeals reversed and remanded because neither party joined a necessary party under CR 19, namely Pierce County.

Although this case is a fairly straightforward application of basic civil procedure, the reasoning has some implications that merit discussion.  The court reasoned that Pierce County had an interest in "requiring that Woodfield provide recreational opportunities for the new subdivision's families on site," and as such Mr. Graziano's plea for quiet title could not be resolved without the county.  The County's interest began when it demanded, as a condition for plat approval, the dedication of a certain amount of space in the neighborhood for recreation and park facilities.  When a County does this, it's called an exaction: where a condition for development is imposed on a parcel of land that requires part of the land to be dedicated to public use.

It is unclear at this point how wide reaching this holding may be.  Possibly, it will be exceedingly rare because most people probably don't go around buying deed restricted property in tax foreclosure sales.  On the other hand, it's possible that this sort of thing happens all of the time.  Further, considering how many deed restrictions stem from public regulation, it is possible that Counties will have to be involved in a significantly larger number of lawsuits dealing with homeowners and homeowners' associations.

Subscribe in a reader

Copyright 2014-2018 by Issaquah Law Group, PLLC. Powered by Squarespace. Background image by jakeliefer.