Subscribe in a reader

ISSAQUAH LAW GROUP - PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION LAWYERS

Issaquah Law Group - Personal Injury Litigation Attorneys

TRUST: Personal injuries are personal. Which is why the attorneys at ILG treat every client and every case differently. Because they are different, and extremely personal. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built on trust. Trust that you will be heard. Trust that you will be protected. Trust that every effort will be made to see justice done in your case. The singular goal of every ILG attorney is to earn and preserve that trust.

EXPERIENCE: ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals and we bring this experience to bear on behalf of our clients in personal injury and wrongful death claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents, bus versus pedestrian accidents, defective and dangerous products, medical malpractice, slip/trip and fall accidents, and catastrophic losses due to fire.

LOCATION: We are located on the Eastside in Issaquah, convenient to Bellevue, Redmond, Kirkland, Renton, Sammamish and North Bend. However, we provide legal services in King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County and throughout the entire state of Washington.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

WA Legal Roundup: Division II

State v. Hager

Hager appeals the trial court’s denial of his Motion for a New Trial after a State’s witness violated a pre-trial order preventing him from testifying that Hager was evasive during police interrogation.  Hager argued that the trial court violated his Constitutional right against self-incrimination when they refused him a new trial after the State’s witness violated the pre-trial order. 

The State tries to distinguish this case from the Easter case, almost identical to the case at hand by arguing that the witness’s statement was isolated and merely a reference to the defendants silence and not a comment.  The court disagrees with the State and rules that a comment is one where the State is using the defendants silence as evidence evidence of guilt, which is what the court found to be the case here.

The appeals court agreed with Hager and ruled that his right against self incrimination was violated when the trial court did not find a mistrial after the State’s witness testified regarding Hager’s evasiveness during police questioning.  The court reversed, and remanded the case for a new trial.

Judge Hunt dissents.

Subscribe in a reader

Copyright 2014-2018 by Issaquah Law Group, PLLC. Powered by Squarespace. Background image by jakeliefer.