Subscribe in a reader


Issaquah Law Group: Experienced Counsel; Client Focus

PHILOSOPHY: Formed in 2014, Issaquah Law Group is a law firm with one focus: providing businesses and insurers with high quality legal representation with the responsiveness of a smaller firm. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built upon clear and consistent communication. 

LITIGATION: We work closely with our clients to fully and accurately understand their goals, work collaboratively to formulate specific legal strategies, and execute the agreed plan of action utilizing methods most likely to result in the efficient and effective resolution of the matter. ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals in the areas of personal injury and wrongful death, product liability, commercial general liability, labor & employment, construction litigation, and catastrophic losses due to fire and explosion.

BUSINESS LAW: Rarely is the path from point A to point B a straight line, so our role in a business law practice is to find alternatives, devise workable strategies, and keep your business ideas, goals and objectives moving toward realization. ILG’s business attorneys help clients achieve their goals with respect to business formation, intellectual property, labor and employment, CAN-SPAM, copyright and trademark

COMMUNITY: In addition, the Lawyers at Issaquah Law Group remain active in the legal and civic community. A core commitment of our Issaquah Attorneys is community service. Our attorneys' civic involvement includes the King County Civil Rights Commission; the City of Issaquah Planning Policy Commission; the Northwest Screenwriters Guild, service as a pro tem judge. We live and work in the Pacific Northwest, and we aim to make it a better place.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

WA Legal Roundup: Division II

State v. Wright & State v. Carter

Back to crimes..

This case is consolidated.  Wright and Carter appeal their convictions for third degree rape.  Originally the State charged both defendants with second degree rape.  S.F testified that the defendants raped her and their DNA was found on her body.  She testified that she was held down by one with force she could not resist.  The pelvic exam nurse did not find any evidence of nonconsensual sex and the defendants argued that the sex was consensual.

During trial the State argued for a jury instruction of the lesser-degree crime of third degree rape.  The trial court ruled in the State’s favor finding sufficient evidence for the instruction despite the defendant’s objection to the jury instruction.  After deliberations, the jury left the second degree verdict form blank but convicted both defendants of third degree rape.

This Court rules that third degree rape is not a lesser-degree charge but rather an inferior crime to second degree rape.  They ruled that an inferior crime instruction should not be given absent sufficient evidence to acquit on the crime charged in the information and convict on the inferior crime.   Here the victim testified that the rape was not consensual and forced, therefore, the court stated that the inferior crime should not have been instructed because there was evidence to support the crime charged in the information (second degree rape) and that neither S.F or the defendants testimony “supported an unforced nonconsensual rape.”

The case was reversed and remanded for a new trial. 

Judge Hunt dissents.

Subscribe in a reader

Copyright 2014-2018 by Issaquah Law Group, PLLC. Powered by Squarespace. Background image by jakeliefer.