Subscribe in a reader


Issaquah Law Group: Experienced Counsel; Client Focus

PHILOSOPHY: Formed in 2014, Issaquah Law Group is a law firm with one focus: providing businesses and insurers with high quality legal representation with the responsiveness of a smaller firm. ILG was founded on the principle that strong client relationships are the key to successful legal representation and strong relationships are built upon clear and consistent communication. 

LITIGATION: We work closely with our clients to fully and accurately understand their goals, work collaboratively to formulate specific legal strategies, and execute the agreed plan of action utilizing methods most likely to result in the efficient and effective resolution of the matter. ILG attorneys have a broad base of litigation experience to draw on in all Federal and State courts from on-the-ground investigations to Supreme Court appeals in the areas of personal injury and wrongful death, product liability, commercial general liability, labor & employment, construction litigation, and catastrophic losses due to fire and explosion.

BUSINESS LAW: Rarely is the path from point A to point B a straight line, so our role in a business law practice is to find alternatives, devise workable strategies, and keep your business ideas, goals and objectives moving toward realization. ILG’s business attorneys help clients achieve their goals with respect to business formation, intellectual property, labor and employment, CAN-SPAM, copyright and trademark

COMMUNITY: In addition, the Lawyers at Issaquah Law Group remain active in the legal and civic community. A core commitment of our Issaquah Attorneys is community service. Our attorneys' civic involvement includes the King County Civil Rights Commission; the City of Issaquah Planning Policy Commission; the Northwest Screenwriters Guild, service as a pro tem judge. We live and work in the Pacific Northwest, and we aim to make it a better place.

In addition, through The Amateur Law Professor Blog and LinkedIn postings, we share pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Supreme Court, as well as the pertinent opinions and decisions of the Washington State Courts of Appeal so that our clients can be as update to date on cutting legal issues as we are.

WA Legal Roundup - Washington State Supreme Court

PRP of Mattson

Mattson was sentenced to 120 months for a sex offense with an additional 36-48 months community custody. With good time, he is ineligible for early release, but was eligible for early release into the community custody. DOC denied the request due to their policy that sex offenders not be released into the community under DOC Policy 350.200. Mattson went to Div I (via PRP) which held that there was a protected liberty interest in release to community custody.

Now, I want to pause right there to say it looks a bit odd. Those familiar with community custody know that it is still custody. I think it would be easy if this were the law to take the next step and say that inmates have a liberty interest in transfer to lesser restrictive means of incarceration, etc. You can see the slippery slope.

Anyhow, after the granting of the PRP by Div. I, DOC did an evaluation of Mattson's community custody plan and denied it again, as well as appealing the Div. I granting of the PRP.

We now reverse and hold that RCW 9.94A.728(2) does not establish a protected liberty interest in early release to community custody. DOC had statutory authority to determine eligibility standards for sex offenders for release to community custody and it had authority to deny Mattson's eligibility for such release on the basis of the psychological evaluation.

Lest you think Mattson is a nice guy, this psychological evaluation essentially set up Mattson for an SVP petition by the state...think of how absurd it would be to release a sexually violent predator into community custody, then at the end of it, bring him back and commit him under our SVP laws:

The psychiatrist based his determination [that Mattson is a sexually violent predator] on Mattson's prior unsuccessful treatments for sexual deviancy, his history of arrests for both sexual and nonsexual crimes, and Mattson's own admission that in addition to his two convictions for sex offenses, he had abused 50 to 60 victims -- girls from the ages of three to ten.

Subscribe in a reader

Copyright 2014-2018 by Issaquah Law Group, PLLC. Powered by Squarespace. Background image by jakeliefer.